That’s sort of repugnant, but apparently it's statistically in line with the preferences of the majority of the respondents.
Automation game countries plus#
The Moral Machine adds new variations to the trolley problem: do you plow into a criminal or swerve and hit an executive? Seven pregnant women (who are jay-walking) or five elderly men (one of whom is homeless) plus three dogs? It’s basically a video game, and you’re trying to min-max human life based on which people you think most deserve to live and how active you are willing to be in their death.Ī readout at the end informs me that I value the lives of executives (who carry briefcases with medical crosses on them) more than the lives of criminals (who carry sacks of stolen money).
![automation game countries automation game countries](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/automationforotomegame-150127060641-conversion-gate01/95/automation-for-otomegame-3-638.jpg)
Do you switch the tracks on a runaway trolley to kill two people instead of four? Is it better because it leads to fewer deaths, or worse because you’re actively killing? The scenarios are all versions of the classic trolley problem, which has itself become something of a joke.
![automation game countries automation game countries](https://blogs.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/styles/hero/public/2020-10/customs_1140x500.png)
But it’s weird enough that, finding it on the web randomly, you might be confused about exactly what the point is. Finally, a video game for deciding who your self-driving car should kill! MIT’s Moral Machine is an open field study on people’s snap judgments about how self-driving cars should behave, released earlier this summer as part of a larger study.